Woman Sparks Debate by Giving Herself Tattoo of Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Camille Vasquez

0
457

A woman has became a viral sensation online and sparked a heated debate after giving herself a tattoo of Johnny Depp’s lawyer, Camille Vasquez.

It was announced by the jury on Wednesday that Depp had won the case against ex wife Amber Heard which started over her 2018 Washington Post op-ed where she claimed to be a victim of domestic abuse.

A spokesperson for the 36-year-old told The New York Times that Heard plans to appeal the result.

The Pirates of the Caribbean actor won $15 million in total, $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages. However, Judge Penney Azcarate reduced the punitive damages to meet the state’s statutory cap of $350,000.

Jazzmyn Wollfe has taken to TikTok to show her for love of Depp’s lawyer by going that step further. User @tattoodingenue‘s video has over 1 million views, at the time of writing.

See below:

@tattooedingenue

💬 #greenscreen #Inverted #tattoo #johnnydepp #amberheardjohnnydepp #justice #camillevasquez #stickandpoketattoo #tattooideas #fypシ

♬ taehyun is so bf – amber ✘ | rest

The video has sparked some debate online, with some saying:

“Good for you and what it stands for,”

“I think it’s awesome.”

“Camille is an intelligent, strong, powerful and honest soul,” another wrote. “This tattoo of her is littt !”

However, many claimed the tattoo was inappropriate considering the nature of the allegations made in this case.

Some wrote:

“This is a real life case, she’s a person not a character,”

“IMAGINE IF IT TURNED OUT THAT JOHNNY IS GUILTY.”

After the spokesperson for the jury announced that Heard’s defamation claims against Depp were not proven, they did then award Heard $2 million in compensatory damages for one of her three claims against the actor.

Both Heard and Depp released statements following the verdict, with the Aquaman star announcing that:

“The disappointment I feel today is beyond words,”

“I’m heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence and sway of my ex husband.”

“It sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke up could be publicly shamed and humiliated. It sets back the idea that violence against women should be taken seriously.”

What do you think?

Leave a Reply